Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Norm Spier's avatar

Charles, you tease!

When I saw your by-FPL tables, I thought I would have some effectuation data restricted to over the cliff (up from just 1 state so far), but I see, by comparison to my (or your) federal data OE-only tables, you have merely reproduced the OE numbers.

All I see by FPL, from the PA report, https://pennie.com/affordability/ , is a bit of data on additional drops post OE. (Being, say, about 2200 for the 400%-500% FPL group.)

Hopping over to OE, my version: https://normspier828307.substack.com/p/aca-2026-enrollment-after-expanded-1df , my table has (of course--same data) your 33.9% drop rate in 400% to 500% FPL, but the naturally-estimated total of 10,048 people magically getting themselves into 300%-400% in order to avoid being over the cliff could mean that in the over-the-cliff-in-2025-groups there is no coverage loss at all. (Unless, as I suspect, many of them aren't really going to be under the cliff when the 2026 1040 is filled out in early 2027--and they have to pay all of the up to tens of thousands of dollars in money they thought they saved back.)

No posts

Ready for more?