Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Norm Spier's avatar

Thanks, Charles. Only a person who really likes data can know your true value!

1) I was delighted, actually, that this state is providing some over-the-cliff data, though not breaking down GT400 into 400-500 and GT500 like the federal OE-only.

Thus, using your linked:

https://www.wahbexchange.org/content/dam/materials/communications/enrollment/2026/2026_Spring_enrollment_report_050426.pdf

and the 2025 analogue:

https://www.wahbexchange.org/content/dam/wahbe-assets/materials/communications/enrollment/2025/2025-Spring-Enrollment-Report_20250512.pdf

I see:

300-400 400+ UNK

2025 35.5k 41k 40k

2026 36k 35k 38k

which, if I compare to my OE tables designed to look at over the returned cliff:

https://normspier828307.substack.com/p/aca-2026-enrollment-after-expanded-1df

and eyeball it, I think the actuated drop is clearly a good bit higher.

1b) Too bad they are not subdividing out 400 to 500

1c) Obviously, my full OE table can be regenerated for Washington state, up to that coarser over the cliff divisions, if I have the energy. I may try something like that for the states with available data if more states provide suitable by-FPL effectuated data.

2) I found, in your linked-to page, for federal effectuated, say: "First 5 Months 2025 Effectuated Enrollment Tables (XLSX)", which, as far as I can tell, has no by-FPL breakdowns at all.

(That's a shame, if they don't put it somewhere else. I don't know how many states with their own exchanges supply by-FPL-group effectuated-enrollment data. So far, WA is the only one I know of.

Maybe KFF will make up for this data shortfall with a very comprehensive survey of ACA enrollees from last year.)

No posts

Ready for more?